The study conducted by SBS Consulting aims to analyse and compare different types of organisational structures used in international companies. The study examines three main types of structures: line-staff, divisional and matrix. It provides examples of their implementation in various companies and analyses the advantages and disadvantages of each structure.
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
The right choice and adaptation of organisational structure to the company's characteristics can significantly improve its efficiency and competitiveness.
Line-staff organisational structure
The structure example:Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
- Operations
- HR
- Logistics
- Finance
- Staff specialisation: Strong vertical management and a unified approach.
- Economy of resources: Economies of scale and factor costs.
- Aimed at routine tasks: Suitable for companies with recurring processes.
- Need for cross-functional communications: Management has limited perspective.
- Automotive industry: Tesla, Mercede
- Banks: JP Morgan Chase
- Retail: Amazon, Walmart
- Food industry: Starbuckss
- Electronics: Apple
- Telecommunications: Airtel
Divisional organisational structure
The structure example:Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
- Division 1
- Division 2
- Division 3
- Full profit responsibility of the divisions: Flexibility to adapt the company's style and culture to the different requirements of the product segments.
- Redundancy of functions and resources: Possibility of duplication of efforts.
- IT: Microsoft, Oracle, Alphabet
- Banks: HSBC, Citibank
- Telecommunications: Comcast
- Retail: Walgreens Boots Alliance
- Food industry: Coca-Cola, PepsiCo
- Automotive industry: General Motors
- Light industry: Uniqlo, Puma
- Logistics: DHL, DSV
Matrix organisational structure
The structure example:Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
- Function 1
- Function 2
- Function 3
- Product/project 1
- Product/project 2
- Product/project 3
- Dual reporting lines: to the Head of Function and to the Project Team Leader.
- Flexibility: Facilitates flexibility at the product development level and speed of execution of tasks internationally.
- IT: Meta (Facebook)
- Telecommunications: AT&T, Reliance Jio
- Banks: Goldman Sachs
- Retail: The Kroger Co, Costco
- Chemicals: BASF, Bayer
- Light industry: H&M, Adidas
- Automotive industry: TRW-ASG
- Electronics: General Electrics, Philips
Examples of companies with detailed organisational structures
Apple- Organisational structure: Line-staff
- Functions: Design, Hardware, Hardware Technology, Applications, Machine Learning and AI, Marketing, Operations, Retail, HR, Finance, Legal, Sustainability and CSR, Corporate Development, Corporate Communications.
- Organisational structure: Line-staff
- Functions: Finance, Applications, Customer Service, Amazon Studios, Business Development, Technical Development, Legal, Media & Entertainment, HR, Hardware.
- Organisational structure: Divisional
- Principle: Geographical division
- Regions: North and Latin America, Asia, Europe
- Functions: Finance, Operations, Legal, New Product Development, Corporate Security
- Organisational structure: Divisional
- Principle: Geographical division
- Regions: North America, Latin America, Africa, Middle East, South Asia, Asia Pacific, Europe
- Functions: Finance, Operations, Production, Design, HR, Legal.
- Organisational structure: Matrix
- Products and projects: Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp, AR/VR, AI, Blockchain
- Geographic division: North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia-Pacific region
- Functions: Finance, Operations, IT, Marketing & Analytics, Technical Development, Legal, GR, HR
Conclusion
The study shows that the choice of organisational structure depends on the company's strategy and mission. Line-staff structures are suitable for companies with recurring processes and the need for strict control. Divisional structures are effective for large international companies where flexibility and adaptation to local markets is required. Matrix structures provide a high degree of coordination and flexibility, especially for innovative and fast-growing companies.The right choice and adaptation of organisational structure to the company's characteristics can significantly improve its efficiency and competitiveness.
June, 2026
Russia’s place in the global economy: economic growth, scale, and the contours of economic policy
This paper offers possible answers to three fundamental questions: whether Russia needs economic growth as a strategic objective, what rate of growth is required to maintain its position in the world economy, and what kind of economic policy can make such growth achievable.
May, 2026
Development of Data Centers as a challenge for the energy sectors of BRICS+ countries
The research examines how ready the energy systems of BRICS+ countries are to handle the growing loads from data centers (DCs). It focuses on the development of artificial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and other technologies that require ever-increasing amounts of electricity: whether the energy infrastructure keeps pace with this growth and what challenges it creates for the countries in the alliance.
