June, 2026

Russia’s place in the global economy: economic growth, scale, and the contours of economic policy

This paper offers possible answers to three fundamental questions: whether Russia needs economic growth as a strategic objective, what rate of growth is required to maintain its position in the world economy, and what kind of economic policy can make such growth achievable.

Public sector
Economics

SBS Consulting
logo
236000, Россия, Moscow, Проектируемый проезд № 4062, д. 6, стр. 2
+7 (495) 792 59 79

The paper sequentially examines the necessity of economic growth, possible policy targets (target growth rates), constraints affecting the choice of public policy, and the principles and contours of economic policy itself.

The first section discusses the necessity and inevitability of economic growth for Russia. The question of whether economic growth—measured quantitatively through changes in gross domestic product—is needed was actively debated worldwide during the 1990s. Most developed countries, with the notable exception of the United States, broadly accepted the idea that living standards and quality of life could continue to improve even in the absence of significant economic growth in quantitative terms. However, halting global growth without denying all people the right to a similarly decent standard of living is impossible. Moreover, aspirations for global or regional leadership, as well as basic considerations of national security, make economic growth an indispensable objective of state policy.

The second section examines the growth parameters required to achieve these objectives. We argue that an average annual economic growth rate of 4–5 percent should be adopted as a strategic target. Such a rate would allow Russia at least to maintain its position in the global economy and, as international experience demonstrates, can be achieved without a substantial acceleration of inflation.

The third section reviews a number of challenges, structural features, and constraints affecting Russian economic policy. We focus only on those issues that are critical for the subsequent discussion: the crisis of trust, instability of policy priorities, the substitution of competitive market conditions with promises and commitments, insufficient confidence in systemic policy instruments, challenges posed by platform-based business structures, and the imbalance in favor of the financial sector. Recognizing these problems and constraints is a necessary prerequisite for designing effective measures to address them.

The fourth section outlines ten principles, or directions, of economic policy. The first five relate to the choice of priorities: balancing growth and inflation, increasing attention to the depth of resource processing and value addition, concentrating priorities around a core group of industries and a “safety belt” of supporting sectors, targeting global markets, and stimulating growth across the entire economy. The remaining principles concern approaches to governance: treating traditional values as competitive advantages, combining planning, digitalization, and market freedom, emphasizing systemic solutions and self-selection mechanisms, encouraging freedom to experiment, and fostering initiative.


Subscribe:

Download full research

Authors
of the study

Aleksey Kalinin

State Consulting Practice Director

image image

Vladimir Samokhvalov

Managing partner

New studies

image image

September, 2026

SBS and OMI study: Young people are more likely than the older generation to see the value of compulsory medical insurance in disease prevention

8 out of 10 Russians would significantly change their behavior regarding health and medical care if compulsory medical insurance were gone: 36% would have to save money in advance for treatment and examinations, one in four (25%) would more often postpone going to a doctor because of the cost. At the same time, only one in ten (11%) believes that the compulsory health insurance system is especially important for a person in the prevention of diseases and regular examinations, most often young people aged 18-24 (15%).

image image

September, 2026

Funding for schools in the regions and its impact on the quality of education

SBS analysts continue to study trends in education development and have found that, despite uniform federal standards, the educational opportunities available to Russian schoolchildren largely depend on the region in which they live.

image image

September, 2026

Real-life overwork of school teachers

“Real-life overwork of teachers” is an analytical report by SBS that reveals the situation regarding the shortage of personnel in public school education and shows how the overload of school teachers, low wages, and stress make the profession unattractive to young people, accelerate the aging of the workforce, and perpetuate the shortage of school teachers in Russia.